This site is now an archive of Sedgefield Borough Council.
Venue: Council Chamber, Council Offices, Spennymoor
Contact: Liz North 01388 816166 ext 4237 email:enorth@sedgefield.gov.uk
No. | Item | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST JPG 315 K To notify the Chairman of any items that appear later in the agenda in which you may have an interest. Additional documents:
Minutes: The following Councillors indicated that they would be declaring an interest in the following items :-
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MINUTES PDF 108 K To confirm as a correct record the Minutes of the meetings held on Additional documents:
Minutes: The Minutes of the meetings held on 13th October, 2006 and 20th October, 2006 were confirmed as correct records and signed by the Chairman.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TREE PRESERVATION ORDER NO. 45/2006 2 MIDDRIDGE ROAD, RUSHYFORD PDF 720 K Report of Head of Planning. Minutes: Consideration was given to a report of the Head of Planning Services (for copy see file of Minutes), the purpose of which was to consider whether it would be appropriate to confirm the above Tree Preservation Order. It was explained that a Provisional Tree Preservation Order had been made at the site on the 24th August, 2006. The Order must be confirmed within 6 months of being made or it would be null and void. The tree, subject of the Order, provided amenity value to the area and was considered worthy of protection to preserve the character of the landscape. It provided public amenity along Middridge Road and particularly the A167 and provided a skyline feature. RESOLVED : That Tree Preservation Order No : 45/2006 2, Middridge Road, Rushyford be confirmed.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APPLICATIONS - BOROUGH MATTERS PDF 105 K To consider the attached schedule of applications, which are to be determined by this Council. Minutes: Consideration was given to a schedule detailing an application to be determined by the Council. (For copy see file of Minutes). It was explained that the application related to the erection of 104 No. dwellings and associated means of access (Outline Application) the former Greyhound Stadium, Spennymoor - Mr. B. Robinson, 36, Gurlish West, Coundon - Plan Ref : 7/2006/0548/DM. The application related to the erection of 104 dwellings on the former Greyhound Stadium site. Details of the proposals and consultation responses to the proposals were set out and summarised in the report. The Committee was informed that the development offered a range of house types and accorded with national and regional planning guidance. A desktop survey, in relation to contamination issues, had been undertaken. It was also considered that the development had suitable access and transport arrangements, with links to the town centre. The Committee was informed that a letter had been received from Spawforth Associates, on behalf of Barratt Newcastle, in relation to the application. The letter identified the following concerns: Ø
Ø The Officer’s Report does not advise Members that there are undetermined applications for development at Whitworth Park. Whitworth Park is a site the Local Plan supports development upon in advance of other allocations in the Borough; and Ø The release of this site for residential development would hinder more sustainable sites coming forward, including Whitworth Park, which is allocated in the Urban Development Programme. Barratts considered that for those reasons this application should be refused in accordance with the Officer’s Report. Furthermore, should the additional information relating to an ecological survey be received by the Council, any revised application should not be supported by Members until such time as these matters referred to above have been assessed fully by Officers and consideration given to the outstanding applications for Whitworth Park. In response officers explained that :- Ø Applications are determined on their individual merits, judged against national guidance, regional guidance and local plan policy and any other material planning considerations. There is no requirement for an assessment to be undertaken of the principle of the development of other sites in the Local Plan. Ø There is no requirement to advise Members of the presence of undetermined applications for development elsewhere. To do so would only raise the profile of undetermined applications and could compromise their proper consideration by Committee by making assumptions about the outcome. Ø Releasing this site would not hinder more sustainable sites coming forward. Judged against the Council’s Local Development Framework - Major Allocations Development Plan Document : Proposed Search Sequence and Retailed Site Assessment Methodology of Housing sites approved by Cabinet for consultation, this site clearly scores well. Whitworth Park, by comparison, is a Greenfield extension, notwithstanding its Local Plan designation. A key issue which had not been satisfied in relation to the proposed development related to the ecological aspects. Natural England had not offered any comment on the proposals. However, the application lacked ecological information and the Council’s own Ecology officers had examined the site and recommended that a Phase 1 Ecological Survey should be undertaken. As a result of the lack of ecological information officers had therefore no option but to recommend refusal in the report. However, since writing the report the applicants had addressed the ecological issues and had sought advice from Natural England. An assessment had been undertaken and although this did not constitute a full survey, planning permission could be granted subject to a full conditions survey being undertaken during the summer months. It was therefore suggested that the application be approved subject to a number of conditions and a Section 106 Agreement seeking to secure the following Heads of Terms :- Ø A Management Plan for the future management and maintenance of areas of open space. Ø A Design Code for the site comprising details of mix of house types, types of materials, surface treatments, street furniture and means of enclosure. Ø Off site highway works including improvements to the junction with Merrington Lane. Ø The efficient use of energy in all new housing, conserving water and utilising renewable energy. Ø The inclusion of elements of public art of contribution to towards public art. Ø The provision of cycle routes and secure facilities for cycle parking. Ø The provision of or a financial contribution towards the provision of passenger shelters at the two nearest bus stopping points on Merrington Lane. Ø The provision of equipped play areas. Ø The provision of 20% affordable housing spread across the site. Ø A financial contribution towards the improvement of the existing footpath network and the A688 underpass, including improved lighting and surveillance by the provision of CCTV cameras. Ø A financial contribution towards the production of a Master Plan for the Merrington Lane Industrial Estate. The Committee was informed that Mr. Lyle, on behalf of the applicant, was present at the meeting. He thanked officers for their assistance and support. He considered that the application would be of benefit to the town and would tie in with the development at the Thorns site. RESOLVED : That the application be approved subject to the following conditions and a Section 106 Agreement with Heads of Terms as outlined above.
INFORMATIVE: REASONS FOR APPROVAL
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONSULTATIONS FROM DURHAM COUNTY COUNCIL PDF 85 K To consider the attached schedule of applications which are to be determined by Durham County Council. The view and observations of this Council have been requested. Minutes: NB : In accordance with Section 81 of the Local Government Act 2000 and the Member’s Code of Conduct, Councillors Mrs. A.M. Armstrong and J.M. Khan declared an interest in this item and left the meeting for the duration of discussion and voting thereon. A schedule of applications which were to be determined by Durham County Council and upon the views and observations of this Council had been requested was considered. (For copy see file of Minutes). RESOLVED : That the schedule be received. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DELEGATED DECISIONS PDF 83 K A schedule of applications, which have been determined by Officers by virtue of their delegated powers, is attached for information Minutes: A schedule of applications which had been determined by officers by virtue of their delegated powers was considered. (For copy see file of Minutes). RESOLVED : That the schedule be received.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COUNTY DECISIONS PDF 52 K A schedule detailing an application that has been determined by Durham County Council is attached for information. Minutes: A schedule detailing an application which had been determined by Durham County Council was considered. (For copy see file of Minutes). RESOLVED : That the information be received.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APPEALS PDF 70 K A schedule of appeals outstanding up to 31st October 2006 is attached for information. Minutes: Consideration was given to a schedule detailing outstanding appeals up to 31st October, 2006. (For copy see file of Minutes). RESOLVED : That the information be received.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RECENT PLANNING APPEAL DECISIONS PDF 693 K Report of Director of Neighbourhood Services. Minutes: Consideration was given to a report of the Head of Planning Services (for copy see file of Minutes) detailing a recent planning decision. It was noted that an appeal made by J & T Saunders against refusal for a first floor extension over the garage at 6, Cragside, Sedgefield had been upheld. RESOLVED : That the information be received.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EXCLUSION OF PRESS AND PUBLIC RESOLVED: That in accordance with Section 100(a)(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the following item of business on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraphs 1and 6 of Part 1 of Schedule 12a of the Act. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ALLEGED BREACHES OF PLANNING CONTROL To consider the attached schedule of alleged breaches of planning control and action taken. Minutes: Consideration was given to a schedule of alleged breaches of planning control and actions taken. (For copy see file of Minutes). RESOLVED : That the schedule be received. |